Do you think it's wise to attack Iran?

Voices are growing to attack Iran

Is it wise to take military action against Iran?

Ex-Mossad chief says it's the stupidest idea he's ever heard...

What do you think?

Do you think it's wise to attack Iran?CBS News

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

22 Answers

Order by
Oldest to Newest
Newest to Oldest
Votes

If you do it, you have to go all out .

I think it's incredibly stupid. If you think the economy is bad now, have another war and completely destroy our economy. It's way past time to stop taking care of the rest of the world and take care of our own damn country.

If a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, then that makes me a burning truck filled with TNT hurtling through a rocket fuel depot.

Leftists are all in favor of war.  They have always been warmongers, they cannot help but be and remain war criminals, and since leftists remain the sort of bigots who always cause, escalate, and intensify war, then we see why leftists remain the most pathetic minority on the planet.

Leftist liberals invaded Afghanistan in 1978, caused the Cuban Missile Crisis, leftists forced the Cold War, leftists caused the Vietnam and Korean Wars, leftists started WWII, and leftists were the war criminals in every case -- particularly in the abuses of Japan -- they had a sociaist monarchy headed by a figurehead Emperor, Hirhito.  And of course leftists have to lie about it to be insulting but that is only another dimwitted leftist hate game.

All leftists are the same.

Leftists all hope to be hated but they didn't get our hate.  There is a difference between hate and pity.

A conventional attack on Iran, carried out as we did with Desert Storm, would send Iran reeling and result in the same lopsided victory that we scored in Iraq in 1991.  With a Republican in charge, expect victory, humane treatment of the defeated, and real peace once hostilities are over.

Starting in 1992, an idiot named Clinton botched up the victory we had in Iraq and set the stage for 9-11-2001.  Would that anyone could claim that Clinton did not act deliberately and in collusion with leftist Muslim powers -- by sheer ignorant bungling if nothing else.

The difference is that this time we have an idiot for a President, who is both reckless and indecisive -- a lousy combination.  Led properly we would win without any question and raise an American Flag over Teheran, subdue that beast, and humanize its socialist "leadership."

Led by Obama we can only expect a drawn out war of attrition, hideous bloodshed, escalation after escalation, and such a humanitaian cost that Obama would go down as the worst war criminal since Stalin.

Obama was taken out of the loop about military decisions in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2009 because of his incompetence and because he is absolutely untrustworthy.  Any way we look at Obama, he is an empty headed fool and so are the few people who still support him.

We can restore peace if we handle the matter properly.  That is why we need Romney.

Nothing is quite as simple as it seems.

There is no real question that we can do unto Iran as we did unto Iraq.  They have huge nuclear stockpiles as did Iraq, but they know better than to use them -- as long as our anti-missile birds can skeet shoot anything they can fly out of the air. 

The question is about their conventional capability.  We have that in no short suit and I am not sure that even Iran is stupid enough to pull a bluff -- because they know we can call it and still have chips.

I will have to agree that the weak link is Obama.  Replace that moron and we have a winning hand in ths strategic poker game.

Leftists don't matter, but reason matters. Disregard leftists as they cannot understand reason.

War is hell, so says the sage.
Yet the Middle East does rage!
When better led we'll sure engage.
Obama's gone, so turn the page.

Is Obama good enough? Or would you rather have a SOBER president?

Obatso is gona get us in a war with Iran, all right.  His staff done pulled him out of any decisions cause he is just plain stupid and only got worse sitting by the lines while every body else is doing his job for him. 

It wouldn't be so bad but Obatso gets a word in edge wise now and then and that screws up everything.  Obatso told Israel they can't expect us to help 'em so what does that do to all our other allies? 

That makes 'em think we're going chicken!

I can't think of a worse way to start a long drawn out war than that.

Thanks a heap, Obatso.  It will be another Vietnam.

I wonder if there is a less intelligent form of life than brainless leftists?

5 of these answers are from the same person...right, sybil?...

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Are you for or against attacking Iran?

UK joins Obama in preventing an attack on Iran What is your opinion - should we push to prevent an attack on Iran?

Asked: Can Israel Attack Iran Alone?

Can Israel go against Iran without the support of the US? Should they?

Asked: Will Israel Attack Iran Against US Wishes?

A military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities is "not prudent" at the present moment, America's top military official, Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, told "CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS " in an interview ...

Ask a Question... We'll forward it to people who know

More Questions

How do you think the crisis in Iran will play out? Will protesters get

I think this report came to AOL Answers severely distorted by a leftist liberal hoping to get sympathy for a gang of morons that is known to severely mishandle even the simplest of matters. So far, all that our AOLA propaganda team allow is hatemongering and bitterness, which of course is intended ...

Iran Recounts Some Votes

Can't be solved under the current U.S. administration. Dictators like this only understand one thing. Lethal Force

I have a cockatiel bird and I think that at night ...

So I guess you have to catch the mouse and if you think the bird is injured see a vet.

Do you think it is a wise choice to get pregnant after age 45?

I think it's a personal choice. I'm 46, and I have a 22 year old son, and a 4 month, old grand daughter. I would NEVER consider it. lol Only because it's exhausting, and another 20 years, worth of intense parenting!