You will find that actual scientists debate the merits of what they have found, compare notes, re-run calculations, and work cooperatively to solve the problem that they hoped to solve. Under NO conditions does ANY practicing scientist ever take anything personally.
Atheists are not to be confused with scientists, although some pursue sciences majors (and come away with discredited degrees). Atheists bicker, become highly agitated, they are impatient, and are irrationally stubborn -- specifically on the subject of religion when no one else even brought it up before.
It is not uncommon for atheists to impede science projects, sabotage the work, sulk for months on end, or resort to criminal misconduct, to eliminate all who do not agree with them personally, regardless the utter lack of any case that could support said atheist or his hidden agenda.
Atheists take criticism VERY personaly, they reject ANY debate as a personal attack, they reject sound findings, and so severely impede science that most labs have to restrict their activities or even terminate them for cause.
It is entirely a disciplinary issue.
Let's cite a specific case to illustrate the point. I'm sure that you have seen the pure vitriol of our token atheist constantly spewing racism and caling everyone Rocmike3 as though we were all required to hate him as bitterly as she does. That is how far atheists go to get their way. That is why science stops cold anywhere atheists go.
Whereas scientists are the most rational and openminded of professionals, atheists are never to be confused with scientists, regardless an unconvincing superficial resemblance.
Rocmike aka AP, you need help and a life. You have posted 4 hours under Bill, 2 hours under Bob Suffolk, 1 hour under Bernard McCaunaghy, 3 hours under Renner who's still posting and hours under anonymous. Watch TV, take a walk, GET SOME SLEEP.