Today's vision of Adam and Eve is that of a Homo sapien whereas the prehistoric man is kind of ape like. So how are these two diametrically opposed visions reconciled?
Two different species. This is not open for debate. Just like all animals, they were created by God even before man: Genesis 1st chapter.
Evil people like darwin , who was a bitter old man suffering the loss of his family tried to justify why these things could happened to him.
there is no missing link and there never will be. Learn to live with this fact-not fiction , that the creation was performed by God almighty. Then it makes sense. Otherwise, you are just grasping at straws.
There were people before Adam and the Bible clearly states this. But that's are far stretch to evolution or origin of the species. The covenant was between Adam and his descendents.
Read the geneology of the Jewish lineage from Adam to Jesus in Matthew and Luke. Also , it has references to theses events all throughout the Bible, old and new testament.
In closing, the apes you see at zoos or in the wild these days are the same that existed ten thousand years ago. Check it out and challenge me.
Little Tanya--I am sorry but you are not very well read on evolutionary biology. After you catch up with modern literature on the subject (origin of the cosmos and man) we can revisit your views about creation of man and cosmos that are two thousand years old. See the movie on Netflix called Creation to start your education. To call Darwin an evil man is plain crazy talk from someone who is uneducated. Come back when you finish learning by reading something other than mythology in scriptures of old. You will be uninteresting until you become better read.
May I suggest that the Tanach (Old Testament) tells what G-d did, not how? Maybe the evolutionest are onto something? Unless you know more than anyone else, why argue? Discuss, fine, but learn what He wants us to do, and make this a better world. OK?
Physicalist is a little bit neurotic in that he has failed every test of science and still claims scientific proof of his evolution hoax.
Perhaps our beloved Physicalist will explain, in terms of his evolution hoax, how chimpanzees developed a markedly more complex DNA structure than did we humans. Chimps have 46 chromosomes, we have 42.
How did that come about, Physicalist?
The evolution hoax, like all other atheist hoaxes, is an insult to science because no atheist has ever become a scientist. Pseudoscience does not count as science, Physicalist. Until you can come up with a sound mathematical model to explain away all the glaring deficiencies of the atheist hoax evolution, then your hoax remains as embarrassing as your other hoaxes including the humiliating...
Remember: all the burden of proof is on atheists because everyone else met the burden of proof fully and admirably.
Dear Roc Mike3;
Is it possible that the Tanach tells us what He did, not how He did it? And, if this is so, is it possible that the fossil evidence of change in life forms is correct? Evolution only means change; as in a life form adopting to changes in the environment. Could this ability in you be a gift from G-d, so we can survive? Do you have physical proof that no life form has changed, but the non-existing ones are not related to, or if related to current life, that there is no connection? If not, then Physicalist has a stronger point of view than you, as he has the physical proof, and we also have the connections.
As for genes and chromisals, many species have more than we do. Hiya itsa vey; such is life.
Oh, yes! I almost forgot; the aborigines in Australia are 86 thousand years more primitive than the rest of the world, due to their isolation. Genes do not lie.