Do people ever get a civil trial this is too many dismissals with out a response from defendants

 

  2012 CA 007990 B: HICKMAN, DERIAN DOUGLAS Vs. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

Case Type: Civil II File Date: 10/10/2012 Status: Closed Status Date: 10/10/2012 Disposition: Dismissed-By Court Disposition Date: 01/16/2013    



Party NameParty Alias(es)Party TypeAttorney(s) HICKMAN, DERIAN DOUGLAS   PLAINTIFF PRO SE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE   Defendant  

Docket DateDescriptionMessages 01/23/2013 Order Filed Order Denying Motion to Reopen Case Filed. Signed by Judge L. Cordero on 1/23/2013. submitted 01/23/2013 19:16. atm 01/23/2013 Order Denying Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal Entered on the Docket ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE, signed by J. Cordero, efiled, eserved, docketed and copies mailed to pro se parties on 1/23/13. rsk. 19:15 01/17/2013 Miscellaneous Docket Copy of Motion to Reopen Case Filed was Mailed to Defendant's.rp 01/17/2013 Motion Filed: Motion to Reopen Case Filed.
Attorney: PRO SE (999999)
DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN (PLAINTIFF); 01/16/2013 Order Sua Sponte to/for: Entered on Docket Order of Dismissal Signed by Judge Cordero on 1/16/13. Submitted 01/16/2013 18:22. MLL. 01/16/2013 Dismissed by Court Dismissed by Court 01/16/2013 Event Resulted: Event Resulted:
The following event: Initial Scheduling Conference-60 scheduled for 01/18/2013 at 9:30 am has been resulted as follows:

Result: Event Cancelled 
Judge: CORDERO, LAURA A Location: Courtroom A-50 01/16/2013 Order Sua Sponte to/for: Entered on Docket Order Sua Sponte to/for: Order Dismissing Complaint, signed by J. Cordero, efiled, eserved, docketed and copies mailed to pro se parties on 1/16/13. rsk. 18:21 12/27/2012 Proof of Service Proof of Service
Method : Service Issued
Issued : 10/11/2012
Service : Summons Issued
Served : 12/18/2012
Return : 12/27/2012
On : INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Signed By : CHARLES CHRISTOPHER

Reason : Proof of Service
Comment : 

Tracking #: 5000124501 12/27/2012 Affidavit of Service of Summons & Complaint on Affidavit of Service of Summons & Complaint on
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (Defendant); 11/06/2012 Certified Mail Receipt of Questionable Service of Final Notice of Acknowledgment Filed Certified Mail Receipt of Questionable Service of Final Notice of Acknowledgment Filed on behalf of defendant Internal Revenue Service 11/5/2012 green card stamp Logistics and Support Services. vlp
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (Defendant); 11/01/2012 Final Notice of Acknowledgment mailed to deft(s) on: Final Notice of Acknowledgment of Receipt of Summons, Complaint Initial Order and Addendum mailed to defendant Internal Revenue Service on November 1, 2012 by the clerk pursuant to SCR 4 (c)(4). vlp
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (Defendant); 10/11/2012 Complaint Summons and I.O. with Acknowledgment Form mailed to Deft(s) Complaint Summons and I.O. with Acknowledgment Form mailed to Deft(s) by the Clerk Pursuant to SCR 54-II this date: 10/11/12. MLL.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (Defendant); 10/11/2012 Complaint Summons and I.O. with Acknowledgment Form mailed to Deft(s) Complaint Summons and I.O. with Acknowledgment Form mailed to Deft(s) by the Clerk Pursuant to SCR 54-II this date: 10/11/12. MLL.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (Defendant); 10/11/2012 Service Issued Issue Date: 10/11/2012
Service: Summons Issued
Method: Service Issued
Cost Per: $


INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1100 4th Street, SW
WASHINGTON, DC 20024
Tracking No: 5000124501


INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
500 North Capitol Street,NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
Tracking No: 5000124502 10/10/2012 Additional Summons Additional Summons 10/10/2012 Order Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Entered on the Docket Order Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Entered on the Docket 10/10/12 signed by J/Eilperin 10/10/2012 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Filed
Attorney: PRO SE (999999) 10/10/2012 Event Scheduled Event Scheduled
Event: Initial Scheduling Conference-60 
Date: 01/18/2013 Time: 9:30 am 
Judge: CORDERO, LAURA A Location: Courtroom A-50 10/10/2012 Complaint for Fraud Filed Complaint for Fraud Filed
Attorney: PRO SE (999999)

Date Filed »  Case »  Opinion> »OpinionsDate Filed »    Case »    Opinion> »02/14/2011    Civil Action No. 2011-0376HICKMAN v. INTEL> et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge Colleen> Kollar-Kotelly02/14/2011    Civil Action No.> 2011-0375HICKMAN v. PACER FEDERAL COURT SERVICES    Doc> No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge Colleen> Kollar-Kotelly06/15/2010    Civil Action No.> 2010-1005HICKMAN v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT> et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge John D.> Bates06/15/2010    Civil Action No. 2010-1006HICKMAN v.> BANK OF AMERICA et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion) > by Judge John D. Bates06/04/2010    Civil Action No.> 2010-0922HICKMAN v. ALDERSON COURT TRANSCRIPTS SERVICE FOR> THE SUPREME COURT et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion)
by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle05/14/2010    Civil> Action No. 2010-0791HICKMAN v. FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF> GOVERNORS et al    Doc No. 3> (memorandumopinion)  by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle05/04/2010 >  Civil Action No. 2010-0687HICKMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF> DEFENSE et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge> Reggie B. Walton04/21/2010    Civil Action No.> 2010-0623HICKMAN v. KENNEDY et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion)  by Judge Reggie B. Walton03/02/2010    Civil> Action No. 2010-0331HICKMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF> INVESTIGATION et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by> Judge Henry H. Kennedy01/06/2010    Civil Action No.> 2010-0012HICKMAN v. ARCHIVES et al    Doc No. 3> (memorandum opinion)  by Judge Emmet G.> Sullivan12/23/2009    Civil Action No. 2009-2410HICKMAN v.> FREEDOM LIBERTY INDEPENDENCE PARTY et al    Doc No. 3> (memorandum opinion)  by Judge Emmet G.> Sullivan12/23/2009    Civil Action No. 2009-2409HICKMAN
v.> NASA et al    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge> Emmet G. Sullivan11/27/2009    Civil Action No.> 2009-2251HICKMAN v. UNITED STATES MINT et> al  Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge Ricardo M.> Urbina08/26/2009    Civil Action No. 2009-1616HICKMAN v.> FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION    Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion)  by Judge Reggie B. Walton07/23/2009    Civil> Action No. 2009-1362HICKMAN v. COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD  > Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by Judge Richard W.> Roberts06/10/2009    Civil Action No. 2009-1071HICKMAN v.> FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION    Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion)  by Judge Richard J. Leon05/26/2009    Civil> Action No. 2009-0974HICKMAN v. THE PENTAGON OF THE UNITED> STATES OF AMERICA    Doc No. 3 (memorandum opinion)  by> Judge Rosemary M. Collyer05/04/2009    Civil Action No.> 2009-0816HICKMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE    Doc No. 3> (memorandum and opinion)  by Judge John D.>
Bates02/24/2009    Civil Action No. 2009-0359HICKMAN v.> WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY    Doc No. 3 (memorandum> opinion)  by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle02/20/2009    Civil> ActionNo. 2009-0342HICKMAN v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED> STATES OF AMERICA    Doc No. 3 (memorandum and opinion) > by Judge Ellen
 

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Is it hard being a parent?

Is it hard being a parent?

Asked: Is it hard being a parent?

Is it hard being a parent?

Asked: What does the term infinity mean with a step ...

what does the term infinity mean with a step parent and step child?

More Questions

Co-defendant

If you are filling out court forms, please be advised that most forms are standardized generic forms, meaning that they are not specific to your particular case. As such, the forms may ask for information which does not apply to you (the 'co-dependant' issue, for instance). Fill the forms out to ...

What is a Civil Designer ?

Every worthy university has engineering courses, civil engineering being one of the most needed. It is a well regarded major, civil engineers are always in demand, well paid, and highly respected.

What is civil inattention?

Civil Inattention Civil inattention Definition: According to Anthony Giddens (p.114 -115, 2003), civil inattention is the process whereby individuals who are in the same physical setting demonstrate to one another that they are aware of each others presence. When one person quickly glances at ...

Civil documents

have it printed brother printer cartridges