Discuss Michael's answer to: Can omnipotence really exist, and therefore any God that is omnipotent and all knowing?

Omnipotence - infinite power, almighty All knowing - infinite knowledge / awareness So if a God is omnipotent, and all knowing, he would need to be able to foresee the future, including his own ...

For those that BELIEVE  no proof is necessary 

For those that do not believe no proof is possible 

Smile Smile Jesus still loves you!

So I got me a pen and a paper, and I made up my own little sign. I said, "Thank you Lord, for thinkin' about me, I'm alive and doin' fine."
Liked this answer? Tell your friends about it

11 Comments About This Answer

Add your comment
 
KakSak

You didn't really answer the question, did you?

 
Southern 7162 Thinks this answer is Helpful:

Leave it to Physicalist to be evasive.  His loaded questions are so amateurish that they do not merit any well thought out answer. 

 

God has given us all the mind and material bodies we have to be redeemed from a previous state as disobedient spirits.  Virtually everyone has risen to good and caring stewardship of others, making Christians and Jews the humanitarians that the world desperately needs.

 

What have atheists ever done besides start wars and act out hateful games?  What have atheists ever done but act out pure evil in exchange for thirty pieces of silver.

 

That is why everyone laughs at the brutal and foolish atheist minority, because you only make yourselves miserable with your prepubescent games, loaded questions, and hate.

 

That is the only answer any atheist ever needed and you had best take it to heart.

 
KakSak

Yeah, you're right, it's Atheists that started the Crusades.......OH NO, WAIT!!! That was Christians.

 

And please, would you grow up and stop being so paranoid that you think I'm someone else aka Physicalist. Why not try and leave AOL politics out of this, and answer the question at hand?

I believe the question makes perfect sense, and is perfectly valid. Why do you refrain from answering it, and have to resort to badmouthing Atheists? 

 
dfrogpong

rocmike your alias southern stops posting and you switch to stanley. i am sure more will follow.

 
Stanley Pembroke Thinks this answer is Helpful:

Kaksak, kindly remember the fact that the Muslims deliberately provoked the Crusades then, just as they provoke military retalition now.  It is a purposeful stunt that Muslims have always used as a propaganda crutch.  Convenient, is it not, that Muslims conceal material fact about their incessant provocations to war and then claim that cold blooded murderers are martyrs -- if they murder Jews and Christians.

 

It is disappointing that atheists resort to amateurish loaded questions as though educated persons could not see through them instantly. 

 

My, how pathetic.

 
fletcherba234

Sometime in the Middle Ages, a pedophile named Mohammad was pitched out of the cult of Zoroaster as a child molester.  He was not worthy then and his cult -- Islam -- is not worthy now.

 

In 1977, a lunatic named Khomeini grabbed 56 Marines in the Teheran Embassy.  Why these guys didn't follow their orders by kicking those moron's wimpy asses is fit for a General Court Martial to review but that is neither here nor there. 

 

The war that followed between Iran and Iraq killed at least 100,000 people over twelve hellish years in needless human wave attacks, chemical attacks, and the threat of internal sabotage with dirty Soviet nukes.  Iran proved that they were utterly brutal but they also proved that their best men would break and run at the first sight of a better trained force.

 

Iraq suffered a worse disciplinary problem than did Iran.  Saddam's grim reapers were suicidal at best but did little to change the course of the war.  Suicide attacks are great for provoking organized military retaliation but are markedly ineffective in combat.

 

We found out that Muslims can be vengeful, delusional, misled, stubborn, and cowardly, but these traits are grounds for a Dishonorable Discharge.

 

When I deployed into Operation Desert Storm, I was not particularly impressed with their fighting.  There is a difference between the use of disciplined force and random terror.  That is why the forces of Iraq broke so very quickly and that was why we had to take out their armor and heavy transport once these people turned tail and fled from Kuwait.

 

If Muslims will do that to each other, and then flee like cowards once confronted by a credible and disciplined force, then is there one thing to make us respect these crybabies and losers?

 

If there is, then what is it?

 
Dr. Kelly

No one takes atheists seriously, unless it is to court to file wage assignments for their hospital hobo frequent flyer drug habits.  I can think of nothing to respect about atheists or any other cult of extremists.

 
KakSak

"No one takes atheists seriously..." - YOUR opinion, generalisin and assuming that your way of thinking is the only perspective in existence, and that anyone who does not share this view is wrong, evil and lost.

 

Get a grip on life!

 
Anonymous Commenter Thinks this answer is Helpful:

Is there any reason to take atheists seriously?  Their silly games are so amateurish that it hurts.  That is why atheists always lose.  Kak Sak is merely another boring screen name for Physicalist so we see that all atheists are equally boring.  Atheism has been losing ground for a long time.  The very few who remain are absolutely frantic that their dimwit cult will dies off completely in the next very few years. 

 

Even the densest uneducated atheist will come to his senses or drink himself to death eventually.  Either way, we see true justice.

 

Encouraging for everyone, I must say!

 
Michael

Dr. Kelly's remark was very accurate and true. 

Kak Sak I believe your avatar should be considered "stolen Valor" and you should be prosecuted. Just my opinion!

Add Your Comment (or add your own answer)
Insert: