Can modern science ascertain the universal laws of nature?

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

4 Answers

Order by
Oldest to Newest
Newest to Oldest
Votes

I don't think I will even inquire as to what the universal laws are. And I won't even think about the GUT.

 

Given time, yes.

Keep close to Nature's heart... climb a mountain or spend a week in the woods. Wash your spirit clean.* Victims of circumstance owe it to fate. Victims of choice owe it to themselves.*One of the widest gaps in human experience is the gap between what we say we want to be and our willingness to discipline ourselves to get there.

Whatever these laws are why should they (continue to) be obeyed?

There is no reason to consider them neither as absolute nor as necessary.

Thus they are purely contngent and nothing can ascertain them.

A clash of ideas is not a catastrophe, it is an opportunity. Only its constructive conclusions should be allowed to leave the academic framework.

Do you want to get a Nobel Prize?

It seems to me that's the purpose of science is, by its methods, to discover what is at the bottom of things, that is, the way the universe operates  in an objective sense. I'd say this is different for the "soft" or "subjective" (person-centered) subjects [psychology, sociology, anthroplogy, etc.] that involve creatures who seem to have minds of their own and don't especially want to obey any "laws."

"Subjectivity is Truth." (Soren Kierkegaard)

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Science Fair??

What are some creative ideas for the science fair?? I really want to win this year so give me some creative and original ideas. I also dont want "too easy" ideas. Anyway, I need project ideas for the ...

Asked: The basic layout of science and philosophy

The following the basic layout of all science and philosopy. Do you disagree? Every science and philosophy is basically to address the quesiton: What would be formed? This question embodies - the ...

Asked: Has science proved that only the professional ...

Has science proved that only the professional scientists are intellects while all the others are pseudo-intellects?

More Questions

Can’t the nature of anything be known from the universal laws of

Your theory is not true. How do you say everything is satisfiable? you can't satisfy an inanimate object because they have no emotion state, opinion or thought. Substitutability- You say everyhting has substitutablility. If I substitute your blood with water, you will cease to be living. So we can ...

The nature of anything can be known from the universal laws of nature

ok, what is the nature of faith and how do the laws of nature explain it?

Have you ever tried to prove that the laws of nature are universal? If

3. The laws of nature have no bearing on abstract objects Natural laws only explain the way *physical* things interact. Such laws tell us nothing about the "nature" of abstract objects such as propositions, concepts, classes, the number 7, etc.[5] Conclusion: Physical laws are useless for ...

Have you ever tried to prove that the laws of nature are universal? If

3. The laws of nature have no bearing on abstract objects Natural laws only explain the way *physical* things interact. Such laws tell us nothing about the "nature" of abstract objects such as propositions, concepts, classes, the number 7, etc.[5] Conclusion: Physical laws are useless for ...