The Supreme Court ruled that makers of generic drugscannot be sued for inadequate warnings. What is their logic behind this decision?
In my opinion, the logic in that decision is that makers of generic drugs will not be held responsible for the warnings they put on their drugs. This opens the door for them to conveniently leave off warnings that should be included. The decision is clearly to protect the drug makers.
I agree with you, and I think it is a bad decision.