Is this legal

Lawsuit makes no sense, has no chance



A Mr. Derian Douglas Hickman filed suit in U.S. District Court against the Department of Defense, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Bell Helicopter, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Six Flags Theme Park, Luxor Las Vegas Casino, and Sky Angel Satellite TV.
You know: them.
In its entirety, Mr. Hickman's one-page complaint stated:

"Requesting verifying information involving prepayment of fees and poverty. Requesting previous civil filing patent and royalty payments and/or filings. Employer identification numbers and employee identification number and tax filings verifying my previous business filings. Freedom liberty and independence party donations. From any above company involving the election of Darian Douglas Hickman for President of the United States or Governor of Virginia[,] Texas or Wyoming. Requesting a trial by jury documents and amount due. Please include my exact words in your opinion. Please."

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton dismissed the claim on the basis that it stated no specific injury.

Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s)
HICKMAN, DERIAN DOUGLAS PLAINTIFF PRO SE

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Defendant 

Schedule Date Schedule Time Description
01/18/2013 09:30 AM Initial Scheduling Conference-60

Docket Date Description Messages
10/11/2012 Service Issued Issue Date: 10/11/2012
Service: Summons Issued
Method: Service Issued
Cost Per: $

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
1100 4th Street, SW
WASHINGTON, DC 20024
Tracking No: 5000124501

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
500 North Capitol Street,NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
Tracking No: 5000124502
10/10/2012 Additional Summons Additional Summons
10/10/2012 Order Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Entered on the Docket Order Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Entered on the Docket 10/10/12 signed by J/Eilperin
10/10/2012 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Filed Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Filed
Attorney: PRO SE (999999)
10/10/2012 Event Scheduled Event Scheduled
Event: Initial Scheduling Conference-60 
Date: 01/18/2013 Time: 9:30 am 
Judge: CORDERO, LAURA A Location: Courtroom A-50
10/10/2012 Complaint for Fraud Filed Complaint for Fraud Filed

Attorney: PRO SE (999999

Event: Initial Scheduling Conference-60 
Date: 01/18/2013 Time: 9:30 am 
Judge: CORDERO, LAURA A Location: Courtroom A-50


Is this legal


Read more here: http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/law/2010/05/lawsuit-makes-no-sense-has-no-chance.html#storylink=cpy

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Why should parents be given joint custody?

Why should parents be given joint custody?

Asked: Is it hard being a parent?

Is it hard being a parent?

Asked: Is it hard being a parent?

Is it hard being a parent?

Ask a Question... We'll forward it to people who know

More Questions

Mugshots.com legality to post someone's mugshots.

Yeah, they have the right to publish it! But, no matter you can remove it from here. It is a site which will remove anyone mugshot from, any mugshot related sites..You can use http://removemugshots.com and they had the mugshot down within 24 hours! One of my cousin remove his face from there within ...

Did ray nagin mayor get sentenced

What up in Chocolate City?

Legality

It is if its pluetonic. If sexual relations, depends on your state's statute for minor consent.

Consumer Legal Services are they legitimate?

Legitimate assistance plans normally include the elements that appear to be really essential for the customer. http://www.magnals.com