Kim Kardashian and PETA: Who's Right?

What do you think about the fact the Kim Kardashian wears fur?

Kim Kardashian and PETA: Who's Right?5min

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

6 Answers

Order by
Oldest to Newest
Newest to Oldest

I don't really care what Kim Kardashian wears, and as far as I'm concerned PETA are nothing but terrorists.

If a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, then that makes me a burning truck filled with TNT hurtling through a rocket fuel depot.

I wear fleece-lined
Levi jacket during cold.
No animals killed 4 that.
Fake fleece is washable.

Leftists drive ppl to grudges. What good is there in that? Elections here are over. Fix up what Obama ruined.

People have always worn furs....the real thing...Kim evidently has enough money to wear them and she is not goofy enough to let the PETA people bother her.  I agree with Bonestructure about some....I said...some...Peta people being terriost.  They are like the Greenpeace people who attack cargo ships.  Peta members who throw blood and/or red paint on people wearing fur are criminals.  We cannot go around behaving like criminals in order to stop what we believe to be a crime.  Jimmney Christmas....!!

Who cares? I could care less!!

I don't wish to be argumentative ,but I disagree with the Islamic belief that I should be killed! " If radical atheists decided they needed to kill believers to ensure their place in nothingness, I'd be criticizing that too."

First off I try not to think of this Bimbo she is as useful to the humanrace as a rabid boarhog.  Oh wait at least the hog provides food when not rabid.

Any woman who would wear the skins of an animal when she knows what is done to provide these skins and how the animals are skinned needs to be put into the position of killing and skinning it.  She needs to be brought face to face to the reality of what she is helping to promote.

So you say well maybe we should all work in a slaughterhouse, well perhaps we should so we could demand a change in the brutality of the killing of the animals there.  However they provide food for our bodies whereas these creatures only provide some sick vision of being "Special" to these idiot women.

Pamala Anderson now she has a body and she has a face and she works to stop this cruelty.  Her father was a hunter and one look into his meat locker convinced her to work for PETA.

All the women who choose to wear fur need a swift kick and boot to the backside perhaps someday she will get bit by that rabid boarhog.

Lady Darko

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Will Sexy Ads Help PETA?

Over the years PETA's sexy Super Bowl ads have become a bit of a pastime in the run up to the big game. Especially since every year, NBC politely declines $3 million and prevents the Super Bowl ...

Asked: Unethical / Illegal Actions by Mineral Rights ...

When a mineral leasing co. pays $10 an acre to a 93 yr. old lady that owns 60 acres for $600 five years ago when mineral rights were bringing $100 an acre then tells the lady now, five years later ...

Asked: Furry Kanye and Amber Rose

Are Kanye and his girlfriend Amber Rose going overboard with their fur? Should PETA intervene?

Ask a Question... We'll forward it to people who know