Originated From Facebook
The reports about the earthquake in Japan talk about damage to buildings, nuclear powerplants and water infrastructure, but nothing about damage to the railway tracks. Doesn't it seem strange? How is that possible?
Hi,
It was a major quacke and there are many casualties...
The roads and railways were closed for a while, but no reports of damages so far. I guess because they are basically two dimensional (they have no hight, unlike buildings), if they're not too close to the nucleous they can stay intact.
One track was buried under a mud slide
The epicenter of the earthquake was in the middle of the Sea of Japan, and sometimes the places that affected the worst are the places that are the most unstable, not the places underground. Sure, there was some damage underground and some things that had to be repaired, but most of the terrible damage was from buildings that weren't built to withstand that much shaking.
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them