Discuss Leagle's answer to: Should it be illegal to advocate for censorship?

Andrew, your incorrect spellings make it quite clear that your conclusions are also incorrect.  Any way we consider it, yours is very sloppy work, hence rejected.  To be a published author in a free nation one must write professionally, not as you do. 

As to the First Amendment.  Kindly note that it protects us from the abuses of cults such as atheism, noting that atheists are the first to impose atheism, enforce censorship, and mandate propaganda.  These abuses are totalitarian in nature hence intolerable in any form.

In 1965, president Johnson struck a bargain with the Soviet Union: they would allow Time magazine to be sold on their newsstands, and we would allow Soviet Life to be sold on ours.  More as a joke than anything else, I actually bought a copy.  It was as dull as the critics warned.

People here read a few paragraphs of Soviet Life and returned it to the rack, thinking that it was as dull, parochial, and preachy as anything else that ever came out of a leftist country.  We returned over 95% of their copies unsold, and told them to hire professional writers.

Soviets to the contrary stampeded their newsstands to get so much as a peek at Time and the very few who offered the best bribes to their black marketeers were able to rent photocopies of Time for 150 Rubles a month -- about the same as a factory laborer's salary.  Even so, the Soviets intercepted over 98% of their copies of Time and said that they could not give them away, claiming that the magazine was poorly written.

Such are the censorship games that leftists have always played.  They were unconvincing then, and they are unconvincing now.  Games will only prove that you are so unskilled that you cannot compete in the real world.  Atheism takes a very severe toll on the intellect.