I once had a discussion about a show called "Work It" that LGBT media watch dogs and rights organizations accused of being transphobic and they attempted to convince the network to never air the show ...
Andrew, your incorrect spellings make it quite clear that your conclusions are also incorrect. Any way we consider it, yours is very sloppy work, hence rejected. To be a published author in a free nation one must write professionally, not as you do.
As to the First Amendment. Kindly note that it protects us from the abuses of cults such as atheism, noting that atheists are the first to impose atheism, enforce censorship, and mandate propaganda. These abuses are totalitarian in nature hence intolerable in any form.
In 1965, president Johnson struck a bargain with the Soviet Union: they would allow Time magazine to be sold on their newsstands, and we would allow Soviet Life to be sold on ours. More as a joke than anything else, I actually bought a copy. It was as dull as the critics warned.
People here read a few paragraphs of Soviet Life and returned it to the rack, thinking that it was as dull, parochial, and preachy as anything else that ever came out of a leftist country. We returned over 95% of their copies unsold, and told them to hire professional writers.
Soviets to the contrary stampeded their newsstands to get so much as a peek at Time and the very few who offered the best bribes to their black marketeers were able to rent photocopies of Time for 150 Rubles a month -- about the same as a factory laborer's salary. Even so, the Soviets intercepted over 98% of their copies of Time and said that they could not give them away, claiming that the magazine was poorly written.
Such are the censorship games that leftists have always played. They were unconvincing then, and they are unconvincing now. Games will only prove that you are so unskilled that you cannot compete in the real world. Atheism takes a very severe toll on the intellect.
Is it possible for you to have a rational discussion on the merits of an issue without going into some irrelevant rant about atheism and communism?I don't know where you're from. But I'm from the USA. and I talk about the USA. I am not at all concerned with what happened in Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.Try to get a grip and stay on topic without flying of the handle. OK?
Now. Are you disagreeing with what I said, or are you simply disagreeing with me just to disagree with me?
Are you saying that people don't have the right to advocate for whatever they want?
And if not. What is your argument ageist what I said.
Are you saying that privet individuals don't have the right to talk to other privet individuals?
And if not, what is your argument ageist that.
Try to stay off the issues of atheism, Nazi Germany, The Soviet Union, and communism if you can.
As before, I denounce censorship in any form as it is contrary to the maintenance of freedom. If we had allowed southern Democrats to rule the nation, I would doubtless be a terrified slave instead of a fearless libertarian. Deep South Democrats impose their variety of censorship in that they refuse to consider any rational dissent.
We of more open minds refuse to play the games that atheists have been conditioned to play therefore we remain free whereas you have become a captive.
Until you leave that atheist mess behind, you will remain a fearful captive. And while you are at it, learn how to write.
So the answer is no to both points.
You are incapable of answering a strait foreword question, and staying on subject.
Rocmike you do not have the intelligence to pretend to be a lawyer.