Should the government make laws that restrict the rights of real people just because something they do or want offends others, but has no actual affect on anyone outside their own relationship and lives? 

 

Think of this as it would apply to YOU. 

Would it be OK with YOU if the state passed a law restricting YOUR rights. Just becouse something YOU do simply offends others. And has no actuwal tangible ramifacations in their lives?

 

Do you really want the government deciding what is or isn't "natural"?

How does that fit in with your "the government can do no right" Pyridine?

 

 

Foolproof you say? Challenge excepted.
Liked this answer? Tell your friends about it
Add Your Comment (or add your own answer)
Insert: