Government agent under oath washington dc civil filing?


(1) Depositions should be taken only where actually needed to ascertain facts or information

or to perpetuate testimony. They should never be used as a means of harassment or to generate


(2) In scheduling depositions, reasonable consideration should be given to accommodating

schedules or opposing counsel and of the deponent, where it is possible to do so without prejudicing

the client’s rights.

(3) When a deposition is noticed by another party in the reasonably near future, counsel

should ordinarily not notice another deposition for an earlier date without the agreement of opposing


(4) Counsel should not attempt to delay a deposition for dilatory purposes but only if

necessary to meet real scheduling problems.

(5) Counsel should not inquire into a deponent’s personal affairs or question a deponent’s

integrity where such inquiry is irrelevant to the subject matter of the deposition.

(6) Counsel should refrain from repetitive or argumentative questions or those asked solely

for purposes of harassment.

(7) Counsel defending a deposition should limit objections to those that are well founded and

necessary for the protection of a client’s interest. Counsel should bear in mind that most objections

are preserved and need be interposed only when the form of a question is defective or privileged

information is sought.

(8) While a question is pending, counsel should not, through objections or otherwise, coach

the deponent or suggest answers.

(9) Counsel should not direct a deponent to refuse to answer questions unless they seek

privileged information or are manifestly irrelevant or calculated to harass.

(10) Counsel for all parties should refrain from self-serving speeches during depositions.

(11) Counsel should not engage in any conduct during a deposition that would not be allowed

in the presence of a judicial officer.

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Why should parents be given joint custody?

Why should parents be given joint custody?

Asked: Is it hard being a parent?

Is it hard being a parent?

Asked: Is it hard being a parent?

Is it hard being a parent?

Ask a Question... We'll forward it to people who know

More Questions

How to file a civil lawsuit in the state of .Louisiana

Procedures are slightly different in most US states. I think it is best for you to consider talking to a lawyer in your area. You may also want to consider facts on how to file a lawsuit to be able to check on the standard guidelines and legal steps on how to take action on your problem. Hope ...

How do i file against a attorney in a civil lawsuit

The best thing is to seek legal advice on what case to file against said lawyer. For unpaid monetary obligations, a collection suit may be filed.

Civil Suit

Yes, depending on your status. As an executor or administrator of their estate you can. If you want to sue the person you think is responsible for their death you might be able to under the Wrongful Death statutes in your state; they will spell out WHO (what relationship or status you must have ...

Court records and civil filings

Paternity cases always involve the choice of the child. More often than not, the child chooses to live with Dad.