Are the following statements logical fallacies?

If you search for divisibility,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

If you search for comparability,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

If you search for connectivity,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

If you search for sensitivity,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

If you search for transformability,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

If you search for substitutability,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

If you search for satisfiability,
you will find it everywhere in everything!

Without the search for divisibility, science would not have found the divisibility of atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Without the search for comparability, science would not have found the comparability of atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Without the search for connectivity, science would not have found the connectivity of atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Without the search for sensitivity, science would not have found the sensitivity of atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Without the search for transformability, science would not have found the transformability of atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Without the search for substitutability, science would not have found the substitutability of atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Without the search for satisfiability, science would not have found the conditions which could be satisfied by atoms, molecules, ions, cells, organelles, tissues, organs, guilds, words, numbers, equations, instruments, and other entities!

Science constantly searches, researches and tests the universal laws of nature everywhere in everything. No scientific method excludes the universal laws of nature. The universal laws of nature form the very foundation for human knowledge. The universal laws of nature will continue to exist until the universe becomes nothing.


What will you do if nothing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability, and satisfiability?

What would your knowledge be if nothing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability, and satisfiability?

Oh, beloved men and women,
You will never have the knowledge which excludes the universal laws of nature!

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

3 Answers

Order by
Oldest to Newest
Newest to Oldest
Votes

If you search for a relentless pain-in-the-backside, you will find it in SoundaryaNayaki.

This is first to Anonymous A.ol, or hear after A.A.ol.

Are wee at the end of our "Conscious Search for Knowledge" when wee ask our A.ol for Advice?'???

The Law of Equal Opposite is about to be written on our H-ear-t, right N.O.W. wee don't have ONE. MARS)( WARS when wee flip the "M" would be it.

Grow some hair on those answers A.A.ol or keep them to yourself.

For those who have wondered Could there be another way, PRIMAL DREAM SEIZE the MIRROR it just could be the other way. Peace L.C. Walkin aka A. Eversole

Soundary, I fully realize that you are trying to start a pop science craze that might support an offbeat bunch, so, kindly realize that actual science has no interest in your games. 

Here is an example of actual science.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/gr/outline2.html#riemann

Even light will bend to do our bidding if we apply force correctly. The lowest servant in Heaven is still in Heaven, whoever rules in hell is still in hell, but they won't rule for long. No man stands taller than when he stoops to help a little child.

Related Questions

Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:

Asked: Arthur Schopenhauer Ended Philosophy! Why was ...

Arthur Schopenhauer Ended Philosophy! Why was he called a pessimist when he made the truth simple. Why was he covered up in the universities. Why do people think they are not in hell. To live is ...

Asked: Both science and religion rely on the same ...

Both science and religion rely on the same principle, "the universal laws of nature can be found everywhere in everything." Could you deny this?

Asked: Philosophy and Literature

How long on the average is the review period for the journal Philosophy and Literature?

More Questions

Getting followers

perhaps by sharing your link. Putting your website's URL in your post enables other people to visit your site. Hey, try playing online casino games. I know a website that offers reviews of the top casino sites so you can start over :)

Which of the following is an example of indexing a statement?

Nothing is an example. You didn't type them in.

Name of the person who hid the followers of god

Her name is Rahab. You can find her story in the Book of Joshua in the Old Testament.

Why do some brusque adults say "Because I said so!" to some?

"Because I said so" is usually a response that harried adults give to children who have already asked a question ~ repeatedly ~ and received an answer they didn't like. By the time you have gone through thirty-nine choruses (asked 15 minutes before dinner) of "Can I have a cookie?" "No!" "Why not ...