Posted by SimonStudio 4 years ago In:

internet, social, ethical relativism, ethical review, ethical, web 2.0, blogging, social networking, twitter

SimonStudio Asked About 'CRITICAL ANALYSIS: TheJesus TheGOD and QRU Loop,Ask a question on Yedda - People. Sharing. Knowledge.'

Is it ethical to follow people on TWITTER that don't want to be followed?

Last night I left three of my AVATARS in loop. I lost around 85 followers.

I shouldn't of let my cat try to talk me into bed. he kept on begging. I didn't realize the feed would haywire. My aliases on TWITTER are listed on my website. I'm keeping it transparent so it doesn't bite me in the ass. Eventually I assume most of you will unfollow n block me... but by that point I will have perfected the craft of puppet accounts! puppet accounts can be fed N2 a root account, where I can follow all fools that thought they could block me. there is NO blocking! the final account will take the RSS feed of multiple accounts and run it N2 one account. you will not realize the new account is me. twitter is about information, not privacy. this should scare off all the Betty eMOMs into a panopticon surveillance phobia. I realize that heirarchy is part of life's function, but as a thinking person I have to make sure my reputation has thorns. it is less important to me if you follow me or not. what is important is I can follow enemies. this is all about following people that block me. that is it. I don't care if they pay attention or not. I'm not the "BUGBLATTER BEAST" if you don't follow me, I'm still dangerous to values that have not been tried. I know u can't defeat logic. I don't know anyone here enough to know if they r enemies yet, what I do know is most people unfollow n "block" because of nothing. It could be tyranny, but I didn't create TWITTER, and if you don't like it... YOU CAN'T BLOCK me. those r my thorns. u can UNFOLLOW with the button, but if u anger me I will enter ur community n convince ur friends that ur wrong. no more BLOCKING. interesting feeds r created by those whose opinions r not popular. they block when questioned. I want in. I want 2 learn n dialogue. I know I don't have 2 like or agree 2 benefit. I love reading Nietzsche n Machiavelli. I assume they would block. my cycle last night was not intentional. I already realized it was theoretically possible. I was trying to filter it out. the idea is to cycle and control multiple avatars from a central one. not create a loop. if I can accomplish this then I can speak to those that block me. speak to the dead so to speak. theoretically I can make god speak. end result was creating a loop.
Is it ethical to follow people on TWITTER that don't want to be followed?

Answer this question

Liked this question? Tell your friends about it

Facebook Windows Live Yahoo Twitter Digg Google del.icio.us Reddit

Link

Embed

Copy and paste the text above to share this Q&A

3 Answers

Order by: Oldest to Newest; Newest to Oldest; Votes

SimonStudio Answered:

you logged in for that? fuckoffanddie?

dyerbrookme agrees with me.

http://simonstudiotheatre.blogspot.com/2008/05/thejesus-thegod-and-qru-loop.html

I'm not an absolutist. I don't believe in a pure open society and I don't think it would be wise to make one.

The reason my system exists is to show@mailourmilitary how easy it is to create an account on twitter and cycle information somewhere. It was an argument aimed at this group of people who were using group cyber-bully techniques to silence any who spoke out against@mailourmilitary. I couldn't see any other way to defeat a group of people who tried to bombard they're opinions into truth by getting military personnel to write me and tell me how much they liked hearing from TWITTER people in Iraq. I felt for the soldiers, but this was just a ruse for a few lonely ladies to feel good about themselves and did not take the needs of the military into high regard.
Read More here:

WHY TWITTER PEOPLE SHOULDN'T EMAIL THE TROOPS

Posted 4 years ago

Man who lives in glass house dresses in basement

Add a comment

Helpful? (0)

Report

woofiegrrl Answered:

Wow, I have no idea about most of what you said. And you answered your own question! There must be some Twitter/Yedda subculture I'm not aware of.

Anyway, I only block spammers - people who are following 1,200 people and nobody following them. But if I genuinely wanted to keep real people from seeing my Twitter updates, I'd make them private. Seems easy enough.

Posted 4 years ago

Add a comment

Helpful? (0)

Report

SimonStudio Answered:

yes I do believe it is ethical to surveilance blockers of Twitter. I wasn't asking what I felt. I'm asking what you feel. I wrote the question like the way someone on TWITTER would write.

If you understand bocking then obviously you do too! Yes you are welcome to make your tweets private, but you can't stop people from creating new accounts to watch you. I follow a lot of people I disagree with. I am on TWITTER to learn and my primary reason for being there is for information. Some people go to TWITTER thinking it is the next MySpace, but there are no friends there. As a result I can follow you better as an unknown then as a person you hate. I feel this is the architecture of TWITTER. I like it... and I am going to use it as such.

I am now on my 22nd account.

The more the beeee---aaacches BLOCK... the more accounts I will have

;-P