Discuss Bonestructure's answer to: carbon problem

I'm a believer in nuclear power. I know it's an unpopular opinion. There's also a power plant in Australia that burns trash and garbage. That seems to me to be a sensible if imperfect solution to a couple of problems and I'm baffled by why more countries don't adapt the technology instead or burning gas or coal. There's also wave generation, though I don't believe the technology is up to any large scale implementation yet. I used to live near one of the first major wind farms in California, and I'm a believer in that technology. I lived in the high desert in California, where we had wind almost 365 days a year. I wanted to design a house powered by a combination of solar and wind generation, with much of the structure below the surface so as to take advantage of the natural insulation and steady temperature that provides. I really think the solution to these problems is a combination of the available technologies rather than just focusing on one or the other. And I think in the next 20 or so years we'll discover new technologies or more efficient implementations of current technology. We have to do something. Gas, oil and coal are not endless resources. Neither is water, and I think a wave generation plant could be combined with desalinization plants to provide another combination of technologies.