My opinion? Because they purposely make themselves as obnoxious as possible. They're incapable of a reasonable conversation and they seem to be obsessively compelled to attack any type of discussion about faith or religion they happen to find. They have no concept whatsoever of the concept live and let live. I doubt they can even stand each other.
Hon. People are as they are treated.
And I for one am absolutely done with trying to have any sort of civilized conversation with people who, because of their personal beliefs, feel that they are exempt from having one with me.
I am not going to apologies or quality myself.
And I am not going to try to answer questions or explain things to people who deviously either don't care about the truth or are too stupid to understand.
People who lie, don't deserve to be treated with respect, precisely because they don't respect others enough to tell the truth.
Sorry, Bonehead, but the numbers say you lie.
Atheists have to lie and play games to conceal their numerous failures. That spelled the end of their foolish cult.
Atheists do indeed suffer an overpowering obsession that can only create misery fr everyone involved. Might we define that as hell?
If atheists hoped to avoid hell by inventing it for themselves, then why didn't they see that the instant they started playing their ridiculous games?
I suppose that there are some among us who are not aware enough of themselves and their surroundings to see the end of that discussion before they began it, but that only proves that atheists are unique in their inability to think logically.
Is that why the atheist Sartre said on his deathbed, "If I had it all to do over I'd be a Priest. At least that way I would have a clear conscience and a mind at peace instead of this harrowing guilt I have tried all these years to deny. What good was atheism if it only causes misery?"
" What good was atheism if it only causes misery? "
What difference to the truth? There is a god, or there is not a god and all your BS means nothing in the teeth of that truth; there is and has never been any evidence for god(s).
Nor is there any evidence that there isn't a God. That argument achieves nothing and is faulty logic.
I have no problem with people who choose not to believe, though I have far more respect for those who admit honestly that they just don't know either way. I do have a problem with those why try to force their unbelief, or their belief on others. Either one is simply wrong.
" Nor is there any evidence that there isn't a God. That argument achieves nothing and is faulty logic. "
That sentence IS faulty logic!! Proving a negative is a logical fallacy.
" I do have a problem with those why try to force their unbelief, or their belief on others. Either one is simply wrong. "
We have been here before, bonehead, and the only forces are religious nut bags and you know it.
I suggest you retire from serious discussions of any important matters. Perhaps they have a cooking section here you could shine in!