SUA SPONTA DISMISSALS AND HOMELESSSNESS
One approximation of the annual number of homeless in America is from a study by the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, which estimates between 2.3 and 3.5 million people experience homelessness. According to a 2008 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development report an estimated 671,888 people experienced homelessness in one night in January 2007. Some 58 percent of them were living in shelters and transitional housing and, 42 percent were unsheltered.
? More than 15,000 people are homeless in Washington, DC over the course of a typical year1
, one of the highest
rates of homelessness in the country. On a single night in January 2013, 6,865 persons in the city were counted
as homeless, 512 of whom were unsheltered and 473 of whom are Veterans.2
? As of January, 2013, there were almost 4,000 people in 983 homeless families in emergency shelter in DC, as
well as many more who were doubled up with acquaintances or sleeping on the street.3
The number of
homeless families in DC has increased by almost 40% since 2009.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark piece of rights legislation in the United States that outlawed major forms of discrimination against racial, ethnic, national and religious minorities, and women. It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public (known as "public accommodations").
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
ADA is a wide-ranging civil rights law that prohibits, under certain circumstances, discrimination based on disability. It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which made discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, and other characteristics illegal. Disability is defined by the ADA as "...a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity." The determination of whether any particular condition is considered a disability is made on a case by case basis. Certain specific conditions are excluded as disabilities, such as current substance abuse and visual impairment that is correctable by prescription lenses.
Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits private employers, state and local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment. The ADA covers employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations. The ADA’s nondiscrimination standards also apply to federal sector employees under section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended, and it’s implementing rules.
Amendment 7 - Trial by Jury in Civil Cases
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Notes for this amendment: Proposed 9/25/1789
HOMELESS AND AWAITING PROPERTY AND REVENUE RETURN
[Latin, of his or her or its own will; voluntarily.]
For example, when a court takes action on its own motion, rather than at the request of one of the parties, it is acting sua sponte.sua sponte (sooh-uh-spahn-tay) adj. Latin for "of one's own will," meaning on one's own volition, usually referring to a judge's order made without a request by any party to the case. These include an order transferring a case to another judge due to a conflict of interest or the judge's determination that his/her court does not have jurisdiction over the case.sua sponte noun elective, on one's own accord, on the court's own initiative, on the court's own volition, on the court's own will, optional and freely initiated, self-willed, uncompelled, volitional, willful
Derain Douglas Hickman petition for review
In the matter of judicial complaint no.
Judicial misconduct involving approximately 17 complaint dismissals 2009-2010
Without requesting a response from the defendants, viewable by the plaintiff or the united states population, the judges are issuing opinion without an admission or denial from the defendants. Also the opinion's claim the cases were frivolous according to administrative rules and merits; the opinion is without a fact finding quest (neither the appeals court district court nor judicial council can provide proof of a search or verification of information contained in the complaint.)
Please include a verifiable search or request for a response in your decision, or a remedy to the administrative dismissals.
if I didn’t spell correctly or did not file the correct form or use the correct terminology,
or add a resolution to the approximately 88 rules and
(FEDERAL RULE 1A-8C EXAMPLE).
I understand plain English. Have I lost my 7th amendment right to trial?
Did anyone in appeals court or district court call anyone listed in the complaint?
There was no summons issued.
No knowledgeable quest for truth.
No denial of my election as governor twice?
No denial of my quest for election to the office of the president of the United States of America
No denial of the number of votes received in the two primaries’ or general election before conceding to the elected office of governor twice.
Also there are dismissals of approximately 5 appeals with request for oral argument.
Approximately 5 denials of rehearing enbanc
3 denials of petition for review by Washington dc federal district appeals court judge’s .Since 2009-2010.
Statements of lost or unlocated or unassigned cases filed in 2011;
Involving Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Exxon Mobil, home depot, Intel, cisco systems, state of Wyoming, state of Virginia, and others.
Federal rule 8b defenses admissions and denials
in responding to a pleading a party must;
A. State in short plain terms is defense to each claim asserted against it; and
Admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.
A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.
Reference attached copy of federal rule for your comparison.
I need a trial date. Or at a minimum a response from the defendants entered as public record.
THE LAST DISMISSAL WAS FROM THE DC SUPERIOR COURT IN JAN 2013
HICKMAN V INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
12 CA 007990 B: HICKMAN, DERIAN DOUGLAS Vs. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Type: Civil II
File Date: 10/10/2012
Status Date: 10/10/2012
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s)
HICKMAN, DERIAN DOUGLAS PLAINTIFF PRO SE
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Defendant
Schedule Date Schedule Time Description
01/18/2013 09:30 AM Initial Scheduling Conference-60
Docket Date Description Messages
10/11/2012 Service Issued Issue Date: 10/11/2012
Service: Summons Issued
Method: Service Issued
Cost Per: $
Judge: CORDERO, LAURA A Location: Courtroom A-50
DISMISSED 2 DAY’S BEFORE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Docket DateDescriptionMessages 01/17/2013 Miscellaneous Docket Copy of Motion to Reopen Case Filed was mailed to Defendant's.rp 01/17/2013 Motion Filed: Motion to Reopen Case Filed. Attorney: PRO SE (999999)
DER IAN (PLAINTIF
THANKS TO ALL THE STREET SENSE READERS
FROM: VENDOR 356 D. HICKMAN