Is AOL Anti Semitic or just blatantly incompetent?
Why are posts which do not violate the Terms of Service removed and then disgusting, vile, hateful, racist posts like the one below are allowed to remain. Does AOL really think that celebrating the deaths of innocent children is ok as long as they are Jewish? That is sure what it seems like.
If someone used the N word the post would rightly be removed. But call a Jew a "heeb" and that's ok. Because in AOL's world Jews don't count.
And even though this post does not violate the Terms of Service there is no doubt in my mind AOL will remove it, because that's what they do best.
Asked:My fellow true christians, did the Jews invite the ...
Unfortunately, there will always be hateful people, dishonest persons with hidden agendas, devious persons who will stop at nothing to deceive others, and other misery.
Clearly Defrogpond is quite sincere in his call to hatred. Antisemitism is as old as bigotry itself. The worst bigots, you will find, are those who conceal their identity.
Look at radical Muslims sometime. The only thing you can see is their eyes, and they are full of hate. All else is covered with several layers of cloth to conceal their identity.
Hateful persons always conceal their identity and behave in a devious manner. The price we pay for their hatred is clearly unacceptable, and it comes back to haunt those who foster any irrational grudge.
De Frog's not so bad. Its the anti semites that god damn that country of Israel that don't take any responsability for the coruption in their own Country while the pro semites are also pro war right along with that country of Israel. The pro semites are even worse than the anti semites.
While Tony's actually gotten a little better, when I read him weeks before now was when he was god damning catholics. I told him the Country of Spain wouldn't even let their pope step foot in their Country to do the same thing jews and protestants were doing in the US after that Bush's reverend Jerry Falwell gave those hate speechs during 911.
Catholics don't always listen to their pope while knowing that was enough to change Tony's attitude on the subject a little bit too.
Jews were in the KKK during the 50's and 60's right along with the protestants and are a lot worse than the catholics ever were in this Country. When people god damn catholics they have to go back 500 years, but all you got to do is look around the corner if you want to god damn them jews and protestants.
At least Tonys thinking is a little more clear while it probably just went over the rest of your heads.
Is there a good enough excuse for hatred or games? Eventually both come back to haunt you.
When I heard this thing going around a year ago or so that the holocaust didn't really happen I thought it might of been the animosity most been having towards that pro war Country of Israel. I did a lot of searching only to find that a lot of evidence was shown on the Phil Donahue show in the 1980's that there was no holocaust, so its been out there a lot longer than when I first heard of it.
I'M not the one saying that there was no holocaust and I'M not the one insisting that there was a holocaust. I just thought you might want to hear what a third party might say. I think I would rather question the world rather than be held prisoner to it, and thought I would slip you another word while I was at it...
Pro semite - Now you know two dirty words.
'It happened, no matter what you may have heard.'
Why don't you keep it on the board maybe we could find out. From what was coming to the surface on the aol message boards just before they went down was that the Country of Britain or the UK or what ever its called gave away that Country of Israel which wasn't theirs to give.
From what I found elsewhere which was right around the same time was that Hitler was a British agent. Hitler was anglo which was coverd up all this time. Hitler was also a basturd child of the Rothchilds who ever they were.
Uploaded on Ytube from a radio brodcast that was two hours long which is based on a book that just came out from witnesses of the time which a good many of them were jews them selves.
This is what I found on my own which collaborates with what was coming out on the aol boards of British involvement.
More than 50 years later an explosion of information has been coming out on the subject, which if any of it was told during the times then they would have been killed. 'Witnesses of the 911 attack being killed' Look that one up sometime.
De Frog makes a lot more sense than most of you do.
Other people asked questions on similar topics, check out the answers they received:
Other people asked questions on various topics, and are still waiting for answer. Would be great if you can take a sec and answer them